GitHub Says 'No Thanks' to Bots Even if They're Nice
www.wired.com/2012/12/github-bots
What Jamie wrote
This seems like a very poor decision on Github's part. Flickr is well known for how useful bots are in adding metadata to photos. Less well known is how critical bots are to the healthy and daily running of Wikipedia. A bot that optimizes images makes a lot of sense. There are a myriad of other utility functions that bots could do in code repositories.
This feels very much like a knee-jerk "computers cant code" cultural reaction, not a sensible view of what can be easily automated.
But all bots are equally unwelcome on GitHub, Doll says. I dont want to see 100 of these tomorrow. Thats the fear, he says. We dont want to be the platform where you dont want to run a project because youre going to be accosted by so much of this activity.
Same host · 89 links from wired.com
Saved the same week · 10 links that week
- SuBMoJour - Sustainable Business Models for Journalism Sumojour Report: Table of Contents
- App downloads smash records1.76 billion in one weekduring the holidays - Ars Technica
- All OmniFocus scripts updated for a Start-based workflow
- Advanced NFL Stats: Play-by-Play Data
- New Coffee Shop Opens On 50th Street