Facebook emoji: Status-update emoticons are bad for privacy, good for advertisers
www.slate.com/blogs/future_tense/2013/04/10/facebook_emoji_status_update_emoticons_are_bad_for_privacy_good_for_advertisers.html
From the page
Saved with the link. Notes from 2007 to 2016 are mostly the page's own words, so this is probably an excerpt.
In theory, Facebook could try to derive the same information from your plain-English status updates by running them through natural-language processing algorithms. But turning informal, colloquial language into usable data is really hard. Even the smartest computers today are terrible at detecting irony, interpreting slang, or drawing inferences about peoples mental states based on their words. Google has some of its best minds working on that problem, and Facebook is clearly working on it too. But emoticons, along with hashtags, photo tags, "about" pages, and even the ubiquitous like button, appear to be part of a grand Facebook strategy to get its users to do a lot of the hard work themselves.
Same host · 25 links from slate.com
- Introducing The Hive, in which Slate readers offer great new ideas for the world's trickiest problems. - By David Plotz - Slate Magazine
- How network analysis can reveal details you would rather hide
- Tiger Woods, Rolex Spokesman: Why did the prestigious watch brand tap the disgraced golfer as its new spokesman?
- Ruby, Ruby on Rails, and why: The disappearance of one of the worlds most beloved computer programmers.
- Minneapolis: Research says you should move to the Twin Cities