A Cypherpunk's Manifesto
www.activism.net/cypherpunk/manifesto.html
What Jamie wrote
This was written in 1993 — thirty one years ago — by Eric Hughes.
Therefore, privacy in an open society requires anonymous transaction systems. Until now, cash has been the primary such system. An anonymous transaction system is not a secret transaction system. An anonymous system empowers individuals to reveal their identity when desired and only when desired; this is the essence of privacy.
Privacy in an open society also requires cryptography. If I say something, I want it heard only by those for whom I intend it. If the content of my speech is available to the world, I have no privacy. To encrypt is to indicate the desire for privacy, and to encrypt with weak cryptography is to indicate not too much desire for privacy. Furthermore, to reveal one's identity with assurance when the default is anonymity requires the cryptographic signature.
We cannot expect governments, corporations, or other large, faceless organizations to grant us privacy out of their beneficence. It is to their advantage to speak of us, and we should expect that they will speak. To try to prevent their speech is to fight against the realities of information. Information does not just want to be free, it longs to be free. Information expands to fill the available storage space. Information is Rumor's younger, stronger cousin; Information is fleeter of foot, has more eyes, knows more, and understands less than Rumor.
I hadn't run across this essay before and find it incredible prescient to the current state of the digital world.
Saved the same week · 16 links that week
- Preparing for the Unthinkable: A Brief Guide to Digital Legacy Planning - TidBITS
- Rabbit’s R1 is a little AI gadget that grows on you | TechCrunch
- The web is not dying – Manu
- Bill Gates, Man United and 20 other sites that ban linking to them – Malcolm Coles
- When Do We Stop Finding New Music? A Statistical Analysis