Smart Locks Endanger Tenants’ Privacy and Should Be Regulated | Electronic Frontier Foundation
www.eff.org/deeplinks/2023/04/smart-locks-endanger-tenants-privacy-and-should-be-regulated
What Jamie wrote
I haven't adopted that much "smart home" infrastructure, in part because of the privacy concerns. I've thought several times that having a smart lock at our cabin would be great, but yet another stream of data that can be sold and shared without our knowledge is enough to keep me away.
- This data could give law enforcement a powerful new stream of data to be obtained without your knowledge.
- Landlords could use this data to harass or penalize tenants.
- Private companies who manage this data could sell it.
- Both the smart lock itself and the system used to store the data could be hacked.
- Finally, smart lock users themselves may be able to abuse the data.
The growing use of technology in our homes, a place that is recognized under our constitution in special ways, without privacy considerations is a problem.
Same host · 113 links from eff.org
- Leaving Twitter's Walled Garden | Electronic Frontier Foundation
- EFF Now Has Tor Onions | Electronic Frontier Foundation
- How to Enable Advanced Data Protection on iOS, and Why You Should | Electronic Frontier Foundation
- To Save the News, We Must Shatter Ad-Tech | Electronic Frontier Foundation
- Celebrating Ten Years of Encrypting the Web with Let’s Encrypt | Electronic Frontier Foundation
Saved the same week · 21 links that week
- Implications of Open Monetary and Information Networks - Lyn Alden
- Leverage is brittle | Seth's Blog
- Introducing BloombergGPT, Bloomberg’s 50-billion parameter large language model, purpose-built from scratch for finance | Bloomberg LP
- Think of language models like ChatGPT as a “calculator for words”
- The Bitcoin Whitepaper Is Hidden in Every Modern Copy of macOS - Waxy.org